home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- History Essay.World War 2.
- Comparing Hitler and Stalin in their rise to power.
-
- During the period leading up to World War II, there were two men who
- were on opposing sides, the men were Adolph Hitler and Joseph Stalin. These
- men were each triumphant in their rise to power in their countries and they
- were very comparable in the ways that they succeeded. Their success was
- mostly attributed to their new ideas and their politics.
-
- Although Hitler and Stalin hated each other, the two leaders were
- similar in many ways. Hitler and Stalin each rose to the highest position
- attainable in their respective countries, and there were three main reasons
- that they were able to do this. Both men were skilled users of propaganda,
- each was amoral, and they both had the ambition to make their countries
- powerful in the world. Since each was a skilled user of propaganda, they
- could use their words to twist and manipulate the minds of people into
- believing that what they were saying was the absolute truth. Using this
- power, they would get people to do anything for them, which proves their
- amorality. Since their countries were still trying to recover from World
- War I, they desired to restore the power back in to their countries. These
- three reasons will prove that Hitler and Stalin were similar in many ways.
-
- The names Adolf Hitler and Joseph Stalin are synonymous with the word
- propaganda. In order to understand how Hitler and Stalin used propaganda,
- an understanding of what the word means, is required. According to
- Merriam-Webster, "propaganda is the spreading of ideas to further or damage
- a cause; also the ideas or allegations spread for a purpose". Hitler and
- Stalin each used propaganda as their tool to further their ideas and help
- them gain the backing of the people in their countries. The form of
- propaganda that Hitler used, and was successful in using, was his words.
- Hitler made many speeches, but the one speech that was a famous one, was his
- final speech at his trial for treason. In this speech he gave his views and
- opinions on the events preceding the trial. This is an excerpt from his
- speech: "...I aimed from the first to....become the destroyer of
- Marxism....The army that we are building grows more from day to day, from
- hour to hour. Gentlemen, not you who will be the ones that deliver the
- verdict over us, but that verdict will be given by the eternal judgement of
- history, which will speak out against the accusation that has been made
- against us....That court will judge us....as Germans (who) wanted only the
- best for their people and their Fatherland, who fought and were willing to
- die. You might just as well find us guilty a thousand times, but the
- goddess of the eternal court of history will smile and tear up the motions
- of the states attorney and the judgement of this court: for she finds us not
- guilty". After Hitler gave this speech, the court was sympathetic towards
- him, he was sentenced to only five years in prison for his crime. After nine
- months of his sentence had been served, he received parole. Being able to
- gain Nazi party control and gain enough supporters, proves that he was an
- efficient user of propaganda. Hitler also had his own minister of
- propaganda when he became leader of the country. This proves that Hitler
- was an user of propaganda, but Joseph Stalin was not as blatantly obvious
- with his uses of propaganda. Stalin did however use propaganda in his speech
- to the Fifteenth Congress in 1927. Stalin said in this speech: " Evidently,
- the opposition prefers to be outside the party. Well, let it be outside the
- party. There is nothing terrible, or exceptional, or surprising in the fact
- that they prefer to be outside the party, that they are cutting themselves
- off from the party. If you study the history of our party, you will find
- that always, at certain serious turns taken by our party, a certain section
- of the old leaders fell out of the cart of the Bolshevik party and made room
- for newer members. A turn is a serious thing, comrades. A turn is dangerous
- for those who do not sit firmly in the party cart. Not everybody can keep
- his balance when a turn is made. You turn the cart - and on looking back,
- you find that someone has fallen out". After Stalin said this, an
- immediate applause was heard. Stalin was telling people what they wanted to
- hear and he used this speech to further his cause. This speech helped to
- further his cause by gaining support from the people, and by justifying why
- Trotsky was not the choice for leader. Stalin was also demonstrating with
- this speech that he was the "bandwagon" and that he was taking people in the
- right direction. Everyone who became a supporter of him, would be getting
- into the right cart and would be heading in the right direction. At least,
- what he believed to be the right direction. Hitler and Stalin did not only
- use spoken propaganda, they were masters of using propaganda, so they would
- use many forms of it. Another form of propaganda that they used was through
- photographs. These photographs promoted their "nice" personality. In these
- photos they would be depicted as being a hero, they would be helping the
- poor families, or be holding a small child. It was these photos that these
- men became appealing to the public. These photos give you the idea that
- they are caring, loving and just completely concerned for the well-being of
- the people. The use of propaganda was a big contributor to the success of
- both men.
-
- Since Hitler and Stalin were able to manipulate people with their
- propaganda, they could convince people of just about anything. This proves
- them to be amoral. Both would do whatever they thought was necessary to
- further their cause, with no remorse about what they had done. In 1922
- Lenin, the leader of the communist party had a stroke. Overtime his
- condition got worse and he became less involved in the party's affairs.
- When Lenin died in January 1924, it left two men in contention for the
- party's leadership. These two men were Joseph Stalin and Leon Trotsky. The
- men had opposing ideas on how the party should be run. Stalin was a more
- aggressive candidate, and therefore had one of his supporters kill Trotsky.
- This happened after Trotsky was exiled, but while in exile he continued to
- preach world revolution. Stalin sent one of his agents to kill Trotsky, who
- was in exile in Mexico. Stalin felt that if he eliminated his only threat,
- that it would mean less opposition to his ideas. This assured Stalin full
- control over the communist party. Hitler was the other example of an amoral
- person. He demonstrated this after he got into power with the holocaust, but
- he did not foreshadow his amorality much before he got into power. One
- incidence of his amorality was when he killed all of his opposition. The
- first major victim of the Nazis was the powerful German Trade Union
- movement. It was a possible breeding ground for Socialism and Communism, and
- therefore opposition to Hitler. On May 2, 1933 many Trade Union leaders
- were arrested and beaten up. Their offices were looted and their funds and
- property seized. A Nazi-led "labour front" was established to control the
- workers and ensure the peace in factories and workshops. A week after the
- destruction of the Trade Unions the Social Democratic Party suffered a
- similar fate, soon to be followed by the Communists. All of their property,
- possessions and funds were seized and both parties were banned. The Center
- Party, which had supported Hitler in return for vague promises, collapsed in
- July 1933, along with the few others still remaining. After Hitler became
- Chancellor Hitler passed a law that prohibited there being any other party
- in Germany other than the Nazis. By doing all of these things it was giving
- us a glimpse of what he was going to be like when he got into power. These
- examples show that both Hitler and Stalin were amoral and would do what was
- necessary to further themselves.
-
- With Hitler and Stalin being such amoral people and willing to do
- anything, they would do what they could to benefit their countries. Each of
- their countries had suffered great losses in World War I and were still
- trying to recover when they came into power. Restoring the power back into
- their countries was of great importance to both men. After World War I,
- Russia had 9,150,000 casualties and Germany had 7,142,558 casualties. These
- losses were immense. Stalin believed that if he forced industrialization
- upon Russia, that it would help the country to rebuild. Collective farms
- was another one of Stalin's plans. "Engel's general formula about the
- destiny of the Socialist state in general cannot be extended to the partial
- and specific case of the victory of socialism in one country only, a country
- that is surrounded by a capitalist world, is subject to the menace of
- foreign military attack, cannot therefore abstract itself from the
- international situation, and must have at its disposal a well-trained army,
- well-organized punitive organs, and a strong intelligence service.
- Consequently, must have its own state, strong enough to defend the conquests
- of Socialism from foreign attack". This shows that Stalin's aspiration
- was to make his country strong, and that he had some ideas of how to go
- about it. Hitler's Germany also had a lot to recover from. "Hitler had
- plans for Germanic unity and German living space. German unity meant the
- gathering together of all Germans in Europe, one people into one empire,
- ruled by one leader. This involved people living in Austria,
- Czechoslovakia, Danzig, Memel and other isolated pockets. Germany did not
- have enough farmland to feed her population of enough raw materials to
- supply her factories. New lands to the east would then have to be taken
- over. Hitler intended to destroy the power of France forever. He hoped to
- take Great Britain into partnership after settling the question of the
- former German colonies". This demonstrates to us that Hitler aspired to
- make Germany strong and feared. He wanted to reunite the German people.
- Hitler and Stalin both succeeded in making their countries strong once
- again, at least for a while.
-
- In conclusion, Hitler and Stalin were similar in many way in their rise
- to power, however three reasons stand out the most. They were gifted in the
- ability to use propaganda and brainwash people, which in turn proves that
- they were both unethical, and they desired to make their countries better
- and stronger. Both of these men succeeded in doing all of these things.
-
-
-